Impact factor 2.0: a name can be everything
The impact factor (IF 1.0) hasn’t been updated in the more than six decades since it was first suggested in 1955. Today there is a broad consensus that it is an inaccurate and misleading indicator for its intended purpose to rank journal quality. This Inklings argues for a long overdue update to IF 2.0 by using existing calculations and a simple conversion to familiar digits.
Source: fertstert.org
Impact factor 2.0: a name can be everything
Published in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine
More from Embryology and Reproductive MedicineMore posts in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine »
- Life after Stillbirth
- The possible impact of COVID 19 on fertility and ART
- Human embryonic stem cell–derived blastocyst-like spheroids resemble human trophectoderm during early implantation process
- What support is available for you in hospital if you lose your baby
- Estrogen receptor-α immunoreactivity predicts symptom severity and pain recurrence in deep endometriosis
Be First to Comment