Bologna criteria: clinically or academically relevant?
In the study published in this issue of Fertility and Sterility, Boza et al. highlight a lack of use of the Bologna criteria (BC) in studying poor ovarian response (POR) (1, 2). Since its inception in 2011, only 51% of studies that published on POR used the BC. This is a relevant issue that should prompt us, as clinician-scientists, to pause and consider the importance of using society-developed criteria for research purposes and in the clinical setting.
Source: fertstert.org
Bologna criteria: clinically or academically relevant?
Published in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine
Couples shouldn't think of fertility as part of a schedule, this stuff never happens when you want it and often happens when you don't expect it. Sometimes like a strange greek comedy, you end up with multiples! Those going through the trials and tribulations of infertility should take swift and decisive action always in pursuit of their goal and take each and every professional for what they offer you to this end and not much more.
More from Embryology and Reproductive MedicineMore posts in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine »
- EP 169: What legal advice do I need when using a donor, a surrogate or adopting?
- Diversity of international surrogacy arrangements: considerations for cross-border reproductive care
- 30 years of data: impact of the United States in vitro fertilization data registry on advancing fertility care
- In vitro fertilization and infertility do not cause a significant alteration in placental gene expression at the end of the first trimester
Be First to Comment
You must log in to post a comment.