Bologna criteria: clinically or academically relevant?
In the study published in this issue of Fertility and Sterility, Boza et al. highlight a lack of use of the Bologna criteria (BC) in studying poor ovarian response (POR) (1, 2). Since its inception in 2011, only 51% of studies that published on POR used the BC. This is a relevant issue that should prompt us, as clinician-scientists, to pause and consider the importance of using society-developed criteria for research purposes and in the clinical setting.
Source: fertstert.org
Bologna criteria: clinically or academically relevant?
Published in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine
Couples shouldn't think of fertility as part of a schedule, this stuff never happens when you want it and often happens when you don't expect it. Sometimes like a strange greek comedy, you end up with multiples! Those going through the trials and tribulations of infertility should take swift and decisive action always in pursuit of their goal and take each and every professional for what they offer you to this end and not much more.
More from Embryology and Reproductive MedicineMore posts in Embryology and Reproductive Medicine »
- EP 160: The Popstar, The Dancer & The Ovulation Test
- Developmental potential of slow-developing embryos: day-5 morulae compared with day-5 cavitating morulae
- Commentary: when embryos hit the brakes
- Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration
Be First to Comment
You must log in to post a comment.